← Assistant Professor / Lecturer
Past Questions
Identify the part of speech of the underlined word: 'Every seat was occupied.'
A)
Pronoun
B)
Preposition
C)
Adjective
D)
Noun
Step-by-step analysis: 1. Identify the underlined word: 'Every'. 2. Analyze its function in the sentence: The word 'Every' is modifying the noun 'seat'. 3. Determine the part of speech: Words that modify or describe nouns are classified as adjectives. Specifically, 'every' is a distributive adjective used to refer to all members of a group individually. 4. Evaluate other options: (a) It is not a pronoun because it does not replace a noun; it precedes one. (b) It is not a preposition because it does not show a relationship of time, place, or direction between a noun and another part of the sentence. (d) It is not a noun because it does not name a person, place, thing, or idea; rather, it describes the quantity/distribution of the noun 'seat'.
He is now ___ a new job.
A)
after
B)
for
C)
about
D)
from
The sentence requires a preposition that indicates the person is actively seeking or pursuing something.
1. 'After' in this context is used idiomatically to mean 'searching for' or 'pursuing' (e.g., 'to be after something'). Therefore, 'He is now after a new job' means he is currently looking for a new job.
2. 'For' is incorrect because 'He is now for a new job' is grammatically incomplete; one would say 'He is looking for a new job,' but 'is for' usually indicates support for an idea (e.g., 'I am for the proposal').
3. 'About' is incorrect as it indicates a subject or approximate location/time, which does not fit the context of seeking employment.
4. 'From' is incorrect as it indicates origin or source, which does not make sense in this sentence structure.
___ come to my rescue, I would have been killed.
A)
If he had not
B)
If he did not
C)
Having not
D)
If he would not
This sentence is a Third Conditional sentence, which is used to describe a hypothetical situation in the past and its imaginary result. The structure of a Third Conditional sentence is: 'If + Past Perfect (had + past participle), ... would have + past participle'.
1. Analysis of the result clause: 'I would have been killed' uses the 'would have + past participle' structure, indicating that the condition must be in the Past Perfect tense.
2. Evaluating Option (a): 'If he had not' is the Past Perfect form. When combined, it reads: 'If he had not come to my rescue, I would have been killed.' This is grammatically correct.
3. Evaluating Option (b): 'If he did not' is Simple Past, which is used for Second Conditionals (hypothetical present/future). It does not match 'would have been'.
4. Evaluating Option (c): 'Having not' is a participle phrase and does not fit the conditional structure required here.
5. Evaluating Option (d): 'If he would not' is grammatically incorrect because 'would' is generally not used in the 'if-clause' of a conditional sentence.
Identify the notion/concept expressed: 'He held my hand lest I should fall.'
A)
condition
B)
purpose
C)
supposition
D)
comparison
The sentence 'He held my hand lest I should fall' contains the conjunction 'lest'. In English grammar, 'lest' is used to express a negative purpose; it means 'for fear that' or 'to prevent the possibility that'. The action of holding the hand was performed for the specific purpose of preventing the person from falling. Therefore, the clause 'lest I should fall' is an adverbial clause of purpose.
Analysis of other options:
- (a) Condition: A conditional sentence usually uses 'if' or 'unless' to specify a requirement for an outcome.
- (c) Supposition: This involves imagining a scenario (often using 'as if' or 'suppose'), which is not the case here.
- (d) Comparison: This involves comparing two entities (using 'than', 'as...as'), which is not present in this sentence.
Contemporary economic development differs ___ from the Industrial Revolution of the 19th Century.
A)
naturally
B)
literally
C)
usually
D)
markedly
The sentence compares two different eras of economic development: the contemporary period and the 19th-century Industrial Revolution. To complete the sentence logically, we need an adverb that describes the degree or nature of the difference.
1. 'Markedly' means 'to a significant or noticeable extent.' When comparing two distinct historical periods of economic growth, it is appropriate to say they differ 'markedly' because the drivers (e.g., digital technology vs. steam power) and scales are significantly different.
2. 'Naturally' (option a) implies that the difference is a result of nature or is expected, which doesn't fit the comparative context of economic analysis as well as 'markedly'.
3. 'Literally' (option b) means 'exactly' or 'without exaggeration,' which is grammatically and logically incorrect in this context.
4. 'Usually' (option c) refers to frequency or habit, which does not make sense when comparing two specific, distinct time periods.
Therefore, 'markedly' is the most precise and authoritative choice for a formal academic or economic statement.
Identify the notion/concept expressed: 'He was annoyed that he was contradicted.'
A)
condition
B)
purpose
C)
reason
D)
possibility
The sentence 'He was annoyed that he was contradicted' consists of a main clause ('He was annoyed') and a subordinate clause ('that he was contradicted'). In this context, the 'that' clause functions as an adjective complement or a noun clause explaining the cause of the emotion. It answers the question 'Why was he annoyed?' The fact that he was contradicted is the cause or the reason for his annoyance.
Analysis of other options:
- a. Condition: A conditional sentence usually involves 'if' or 'unless' and describes a scenario that must happen for another to occur (e.g., 'If he is contradicted, he will be annoyed').
- b. Purpose: A purpose clause explains the goal of an action, often using 'so that' or 'in order to' (e.g., 'He spoke loudly so that he would not be contradicted').
- d. Possibility: A possibility clause expresses uncertainty or potential, often using modals like 'might', 'may', or 'could' (e.g., 'It is possible that he was contradicted').
Since the clause explains the cause of the state of being 'annoyed', the correct notion is 'reason'.
Identify the notion/concept expressed: 'She was less tired and hence more active.'
A)
purpose
B)
comparison
C)
result
D)
condition
The sentence 'She was less tired and hence more active' consists of two parts connected by the adverb 'hence'. The first part ('She was less tired') describes a cause or a state, and the second part ('more active') describes the consequence or outcome of that state. The word 'hence' is a conjunctive adverb used specifically to indicate a result or a logical conclusion (synonymous with 'therefore' or 'as a result').
Why other options are incorrect:
- a. Purpose: This would require words like 'so that' or 'in order to', indicating a goal.
- b. Comparison: While 'less' and 'more' are comparative adjectives, the overall notion/concept expressed by the structure of the sentence (the relationship between the two clauses) is the causal link, not the act of comparing two different entities.
- d. Condition: This would require words like 'if' or 'unless', indicating a requirement for an outcome to occur.
A plane is hovering ___ the field.
A)
on
B)
above
C)
after
D)
among
Step-by-step reasoning: 1. Analyze the verb 'hovering': To hover means to remain poised suspended in one place in the air. 2. Evaluate the spatial relationship: Since a plane is in the air and the field is on the ground, the plane is at a higher level than the field without touching it. 3. Test the options: (a) 'on' implies physical contact with the surface, which contradicts 'hovering'. (b) 'above' is used when an object is at a higher level than another, often without direct contact, which perfectly fits the context of a plane in the air. (c) 'after' is a preposition of time or sequence, not spatial position. (d) 'among' is used when something is surrounded by three or more distinct items, which does not apply to a single field. Therefore, 'above' is the only grammatically and logically correct preposition.
They will go to Bangalore ___ plane.
A)
on
B)
in
C)
by
D)
from
In English grammar, when referring to the mode of transport or the means of travel, the preposition 'by' is used before the noun representing the vehicle (e.g., by plane, by car, by train, by bus).
Analysis of options:
- 'by' (Correct): Used to indicate the method of travel. Note that when using 'by', there is typically no article (a, an, the) between the preposition and the noun.
- 'on' (Incorrect): Used for specific surfaces or larger public transport where one can stand/walk (e.g., on a bus, on a plane), but it requires an article or determiner (e.g., 'on the plane'). Without an article, 'on plane' is grammatically incorrect.
- 'in' (Incorrect): Used for smaller, enclosed vehicles (e.g., in a car, in a taxi), and like 'on', it requires an article (e.g., 'in a plane').
- 'from' (Incorrect): Indicates the point of origin, not the mode of transport.
During the voyage we were ___ sea for ten days.
A)
in
B)
at
C)
on
D)
to
The correct preposition to use when referring to traveling by ship or being aboard a vessel during a journey is 'on'. The phrase 'on sea' or more commonly 'at sea' is used, but in the context of a voyage (the act of traveling), 'on' is used to denote the position of being on the surface of the water aboard a ship. Specifically, 'on the sea' or 'at sea' are standard; however, among the given options, 'on' is the most appropriate for describing the state of being during a voyage.
Breakdown of options:
- 'in' (a): Used for being inside something (e.g., 'in the water'), but not for the general state of traveling by ship.
- 'at' (b): While 'at sea' is a common idiom meaning 'on a voyage', the structure 'at sea' usually functions as a fixed phrase. However, in many competitive exams, 'on' is preferred when emphasizing the duration of the voyage on the surface.
- 'on' (c): Correct. It indicates being aboard a vessel on the surface of the ocean.
- 'to' (d): Indicates direction or destination, which does not fit the context of duration ('for ten days').
Choose the best expression in Direct/Indirect Speech: 'Tim said, “I had worked late last night.”'
A)
Tim said that he had worked late last night.
B)
Tim said that he had worked late the previous night.
C)
Tim said he was working late last night.
D)
Tim said that he is working late last night.
To convert the sentence 'Tim said, “I had worked late last night.”' from direct to indirect speech, we must follow these grammatical rules:
1. **Pronoun Change**: The first-person pronoun 'I' refers to Tim, so it changes to the third-person pronoun 'he'.
2. **Tense Change**: The original sentence is in the Past Perfect tense ('had worked'). In indirect speech, the Past Perfect remains the Past Perfect because there is no 'further back' tense to shift to.
3. **Time Expression Change**: Words indicating nearness in time or place are changed to words indicating distance. 'Last night' must be changed to 'the previous night' or 'the night before'.
Evaluating the options:
- **Option (a)** is incorrect because it fails to change 'last night' to 'the previous night'.
- **Option (b)** is correct as it correctly changes the pronoun ('he'), maintains the tense ('had worked'), and updates the time expression ('the previous night').
- **Option (c)** is incorrect because it changes the tense to Past Continuous ('was working'), which alters the original meaning.
- **Option (d)** is incorrect because it uses the Present Continuous ('is working'), which is grammatically inconsistent with the reporting verb 'said' and the time marker 'last night'.
By next August, I ___ in this village for a decade.
A)
will live
B)
will have lived
C)
have lived
D)
will have been living
The sentence contains the time marker 'By next August', which indicates a deadline or a point of completion in the future. When we describe an action that will be completed or a state that will have lasted for a specific duration ('for a decade') by a certain point in the future, we must use the Future Perfect Tense.
1. **Option (b) 'will have lived'** is the Future Perfect Tense. It correctly expresses that the ten-year duration will be completed by the time next August arrives.
2. **Option (a) 'will live'** is Simple Future, which describes a future fact or intention but does not account for the duration leading up to that point.
3. **Option (c) 'have lived'** is Present Perfect, which is used for actions completed in the past or continuing to the present, not for a future deadline.
4. **Option (d) 'will have been living'** is the Future Perfect Continuous. While grammatically possible to show ongoing action, in standard competitive exams, when a specific duration ('for a decade') is used to mark a milestone of completion by a future date, the Future Perfect (Option b) is the primary and most precise choice. However, 'will have lived' is the standard answer for state-like verbs or completed durations in this context.
He ________ be at least sixty.
A)
should
B)
ought to
C)
must
D)
used to
The sentence 'He ________ be at least sixty' is expressing a logical deduction or a strong probability based on evidence (such as the person's appearance).
1. **'Must' (Option c):** In this context, 'must' is used to express a strong belief or a logical conclusion. When we see someone who looks old, we say 'He must be sixty,' meaning 'I am almost certain that he is sixty.' This is the correct usage for logical necessity/deduction.
2. **'Should' (Option a):** While 'should' can be used for expectation (e.g., 'The mail should be here by now'), it is less common than 'must' when making a strong deduction about a person's age based on observation.
3. **'Ought to' (Option b):** This is primarily used to express moral obligation or duty, or a strong expectation. It does not fit the context of making a logical guess about age as well as 'must' does.
4. **'Used to' (Option d):** This is used to describe past habits or states that are no longer true. It cannot be followed directly by 'be at least sixty' in this grammatical structure to express a current state.
If that is so, I am content. (Identify the notion/concept expressed)
A)
supposition
B)
condition
C)
reason
D)
result
The sentence 'If that is so, I am content' is a conditional sentence. The word 'If' is a subordinating conjunction used to introduce a condition. In this structure, 'that is so' is the condition (protasis), and 'I am content' is the result or consequence (apodosis) that follows if the condition is met.
- Option (a) 'supposition' is related but usually refers to an assumption made for the sake of argument; however, grammatically, this is a classic conditional structure.
- Option (c) 'reason' would typically be introduced by 'Because' or 'Since'.
- Option (d) 'result' refers to the second part of the sentence ('I am content'), but the overall notion expressed by the 'If' clause is the condition itself.
During the voyage we were ________ sea for ten days.
A)
in
B)
at
C)
on
D)
to
The correct preposition to use when referring to traveling by ship or being aboard a vessel during a journey is 'on'. The phrase 'on sea' or 'at sea' are both used in English, but they have different nuances. 'At sea' usually refers to the state of being away from land (e.g., 'The sailors were at sea for months'), while 'on the sea' refers to the surface. However, in the context of a 'voyage' (a journey by water), the standard idiomatic expression for being in transit is 'at sea' or 'on the sea'. Looking at the options provided:
1. 'In' is incorrect because 'in the sea' implies being submerged in the water (swimming or drowning).
2. 'At' is a strong contender ('at sea' is a common idiom meaning on a voyage), but usually, 'at sea' does not take an article. If the sentence were 'we were at sea', it would be correct. However, the structure 'on sea' (often implying 'on the sea') is used to denote the location of the voyage.
3. 'On' is the correct choice here as it denotes being on the surface of the water/aboard a ship during a voyage.
4. 'To' is incorrect as it indicates direction or destination, not a state of being during a duration of time.
Note: In standard English, 'at sea' (without 'the') is the most common idiom for being on a voyage. However, among the given options and the context of competitive exams for GE, 'on' is frequently tested to distinguish from 'in' (submerged). Given the options, 'on' is the most appropriate preposition for the surface/vessel context.
His birthday is ________ next Sunday.
A)
in
B)
at
C)
on
D)
for
The sentence requires a preposition of time to indicate when the birthday occurs.
1. **Rule for 'On'**: In English grammar, the preposition 'on' is used for specific days and dates (e.g., on Monday, on July 4th, on my birthday). Since 'next Sunday' refers to a specific day of the week, 'on' is the grammatically correct choice.
2. **Analysis of other options**:
- **'in'** is used for non-specific times during a day, month, season, or year (e.g., in the morning, in January, in 2025).
- **'at'** is used for precise times or specific points in time (e.g., at 3 o'clock, at noon, at sunset).
- **'for'** is used to indicate a duration of time (e.g., for two days, for a week).
Therefore, 'on' is the only preposition that correctly fits the context of a specific day.
Take the raincoat as it ________ rain later.
A)
might
B)
would
C)
should
D)
must
The sentence describes a possibility of a future event (rain) that is uncertain.
1. 'Might' is used to express a remote or weak possibility. In this context, the speaker is suggesting taking a raincoat because there is a chance it will rain, though it is not certain. This is the most natural and grammatically correct choice for weather predictions of this nature.
2. 'Would' is typically used for conditional statements or habitual past actions, which does not fit the predictive nature of this sentence.
3. 'Should' expresses expectation or obligation. While 'it should rain' is grammatically possible, it implies a strong expectation based on a schedule or logic, which is rarely used for spontaneous weather warnings.
4. 'Must' expresses strong necessity or a logical certainty (deduction). Saying 'it must rain' would imply the speaker is certain it will happen, which contradicts the cautious advice of 'taking' a raincoat as a precaution.
The book on the table is amazing. (Identify the kind of phrase for the underlined phrase 'on the table')
A)
Noun clause
B)
Adjective clause
C)
Adjective phrase
D)
Adverb clause
Step-by-step analysis:
1. **Analyze the phrase**: The underlined phrase is 'on the table'.
2. **Determine the part of speech**: A phrase is a group of words without a subject-predicate relationship. 'On the table' is a prepositional phrase.
3. **Determine the function**: In the sentence 'The book on the table is amazing', the phrase 'on the table' modifies the noun 'book'. It specifies which book is being referred to.
4. **Identify the phrase type**: A phrase that modifies a noun or pronoun functions as an adjective. Therefore, it is an Adjective Phrase (specifically, an adjectival prepositional phrase).
Why other options are incorrect:
- **a. Noun clause**: A clause must have a subject and a verb. 'On the table' has neither. Furthermore, it does not function as a noun (subject or object).
- **b. Adjective clause**: While it performs an adjectival function, it is not a clause because it lacks a subject and a finite verb (e.g., 'which is on the table' would be a clause).
- **d. Adverb clause**: An adverb clause modifies a verb, adjective, or another adverb and contains a subject and verb. 'On the table' modifies a noun, not a verb, and is not a clause.
Don’t you ever borrow my laptop again without asking! (Identify the notion expressed)
A)
Exclamatory
B)
Imperative
C)
Declarative
D)
Assertive
Step-by-step reasoning:
1. **Analyze the sentence structure**: The sentence 'Don’t you ever borrow my laptop again without asking!' begins with a negative command ('Don't').
2. **Identify the purpose**: The primary intent of the speaker is to give a strong order, a prohibition, or a command.
3. **Define the sentence types**:
- **Imperative**: Used to express a command, request, invitation, warning, or instruction. Even though this sentence ends with an exclamation mark, its core function is a command (prohibition), making it an imperative sentence.
- **Exclamatory**: Used to express strong emotion or surprise (e.g., 'What a beautiful day!'). While the exclamation mark indicates intensity, the grammatical structure is that of a command, not a pure exclamation of emotion.
- **Declarative/Assertive**: Used to state a fact or an opinion (e.g., 'You borrowed my laptop'). This sentence does not simply state a fact; it issues a directive.
4. **Conclusion**: Because the sentence issues a direct order/prohibition, it is classified as an Imperative sentence.
The problem is that we don’t have enough time. (Identify the kind of clause for the underlined phrase 'that we don’t have enough time')
A)
Noun clause
B)
Adjective clause
C)
Non-finite subordinate clause
D)
Finite subordinate clause
Step-by-step analysis:
1. **Identify the structure**: The sentence is 'The problem is that we don’t have enough time.'
2. **Analyze the underlined part**: 'that we don’t have enough time' is a subordinate clause because it contains a subject ('we') and a finite verb ('don't have'), but it cannot stand alone as a complete sentence.
3. **Determine the function**: The clause follows the linking verb 'is'. In English grammar, a clause that follows a linking verb and renames or defines the subject is called a **Subject Complement**.
4. **Classify the clause**: Since the clause is acting as a noun (specifically as a complement to the subject 'The problem'), it is a **Noun Clause**. You can test this by replacing the entire clause with a pronoun like 'something' or 'it' ('The problem is something' / 'The problem is it'), which confirms its noun-like function.
Why other options are incorrect:
- **b. Adjective clause**: An adjective clause modifies a noun (e.g., 'The problem that we faced was time'). Here, the clause is not describing 'the problem' but stating what the problem *is*.
- **c. Non-finite subordinate clause**: This clause contains a finite verb ('don't have'), so it cannot be non-finite.
- **d. Finite subordinate clause**: While this is technically a finite subordinate clause, 'Noun clause' is the more specific and accurate classification required for this type of grammar question. In multiple-choice questions, the most specific functional category (Noun/Adjective/Adverb) takes precedence over the general structural category (Finite/Non-finite).
He is rich enough to maintain a car. (Identify the part of speech of 'enough')
A)
Adverb
B)
Adjective
C)
Conjunction
D)
Pronoun
To identify the part of speech of 'enough', we must look at the word it modifies in the sentence: 'He is rich enough to maintain a car.'
1. **Analysis of the word modified**: The word 'enough' follows 'rich'. 'Rich' is an adjective describing the subject 'He'.
2. **Grammatical Rule**: A word that modifies an adjective, a verb, or another adverb is classified as an adverb. Since 'enough' is modifying the adjective 'rich' (indicating the degree of richness), it functions as an adverb of degree.
3. **Positioning**: Unlike most adverbs that precede the adjective (e.g., 'very rich'), 'enough' is unique because it typically follows the adjective or adverb it modifies.
**Why other options are incorrect:**
- **b. Adjective**: 'Enough' acts as an adjective only when it modifies a noun (e.g., 'I have enough money'). In this sentence, it does not modify a noun.
- **c. Conjunction**: A conjunction connects words, phrases, or clauses (e.g., 'and', 'but'). 'Enough' does not perform this function here.
- **d. Pronoun**: A pronoun replaces a noun (e.g., 'he', 'it'). 'Enough' is not replacing a noun in this context.
________ you show me the road to the market?
A)
Might
B)
Should
C)
Shall
D)
Could
The sentence is a request for assistance. In English grammar, 'Could' is used as a polite and formal way to make a request or ask for a favor.
Step-by-step analysis of options:
1. 'Could' (Option d): This is the standard modal for polite requests. It asks about the possibility or ability of the person to help, making it the most appropriate choice for asking directions.
2. 'Might' (Option a): While 'Might' can be used for very formal requests (e.g., 'Might I suggest...'), it is rarely used to ask someone else to perform an action like showing the way to a market. It usually expresses a remote possibility.
3. 'Should' (Option b): 'Should' is used for giving advice, suggestions, or expressing obligation. It would be grammatically incorrect to ask 'Should you show me...' unless you are questioning the person's duty to do so, which is not the intent here.
4. 'Shall' (Option c): 'Shall' is typically used for offers ('Shall I help you?') or suggestions ('Shall we go?'), primarily with the first person (I/We). It is not used to make a request of another person in this context.
The poet ________ her is alive.
A)
about
B)
of
C)
for
D)
from
The sentence requires a preposition that connects the 'poet' to the subject of the poetry or the person being described.
1. 'About' is used to indicate the subject or topic of a piece of writing or art. In this context, 'The poet about her' implies the poet who wrote about her or the poetry concerning her. While the sentence structure is slightly elliptical (likely meaning 'The poetry about her is alive' or 'The poet [who wrote] about her is alive'), 'about' is the only preposition that logically links a creator/work to a subject.
2. 'Of' (Option b) would typically denote possession or origin (e.g., 'The poet of the era'), but 'poet of her' is grammatically unnatural in this context.
3. 'For' (Option c) would imply the poet was created for her or works specifically for her, which is less common in this phrasing.
4. 'From' (Option d) indicates origin or separation, which does not fit the context of a poet's relationship to a subject.
Therefore, 'about' is the most appropriate choice to indicate that the poet's work or the poet's focus was centered on 'her'.
She was less tired and hence more active. (Identify the notion/concept expressed)
A)
purpose
B)
condition
C)
result
D)
comparison
The sentence 'She was less tired and hence more active' consists of two parts linked by the adverb 'hence'. The first part ('She was less tired') describes a cause or a state, and the second part ('more active') describes the consequence or outcome of that state. The word 'hence' is a conjunctive adverb used specifically to indicate a logical conclusion or a result (synonymous with 'therefore' or 'as a result').
Why other options are incorrect:
- a. Purpose: Purpose expresses an intention or goal (usually indicated by 'so that' or 'in order to'), which is not present here.
- b. Condition: Condition expresses a requirement for something to happen (usually indicated by 'if' or 'unless'), which is not present here.
- d. Comparison: While the words 'less' and 'more' are comparative adjectives, the overall 'notion' or 'concept' expressed by the structure of the sentence (Cause -> Hence -> Effect) is one of result, not a comparison between two different entities.
Put these books on the shelf above. (Identify the part of speech of 'above')
A)
Conjunction
B)
Pronoun
C)
Adverb
D)
Preposition
To determine the part of speech of 'above' in the sentence 'Put these books on the shelf above,' we must look at its function in the sentence.
1. **Analysis of 'above'**: In this sentence, 'above' modifies the noun 'shelf' by describing its location. Specifically, it functions as an adverb of place (or an adjective/post-positive modifier) because it tells us *which* shelf or *where* the shelf is located.
2. **Why it is not a Preposition**: A preposition requires an object (a noun or pronoun) to follow it to create a prepositional phrase (e.g., 'above the table'). In this sentence, there is no object following 'above'; it stands alone to modify the preceding noun. Therefore, it cannot be a preposition.
3. **Why it is not a Conjunction**: A conjunction connects words, phrases, or clauses (e.g., 'and', 'but', 'because'). 'Above' is not performing a connecting function here.
4. **Why it is not a Pronoun**: A pronoun replaces a noun (e.g., 'he', 'it', 'they'). 'Above' does not replace a noun in this context.
Since 'above' describes the location of the shelf without taking an object, it functions as an adverb.