← Assistant Professor / Lecturer
Past Questions
She was less tired and hence more active. (Identify the notion/concept expressed)
A)
purpose
B)
comparison
C)
result
D)
condition
The sentence 'She was less tired and hence more active' consists of two parts connected by the adverb 'hence'. The first part ('She was less tired') describes a cause or a state, and the second part ('more active') describes the consequence or outcome of that state. The word 'hence' is a conjunctive adverb used specifically to indicate a result, consequence, or conclusion (synonymous with 'therefore' or 'as a result').
Analysis of options:
- a. Purpose: This would require words like 'so that' or 'in order to', indicating a goal.
- b. Comparison: While 'less' and 'more' are comparative adjectives, the overall 'notion' or logical relationship expressed by the sentence structure (Cause -> Result) is the primary focus here.
- c. Result: Correct. The state of being less tired resulted in her being more active.
- d. Condition: This would require words like 'if' or 'unless', indicating a requirement for an outcome to occur.
He felled the tree ___ an axe.
A)
by
B)
with
C)
of
D)
in
The sentence requires a preposition to indicate the instrument used to perform an action.
1. 'With' is used when referring to the instrument, tool, or object used to achieve a result (e.g., 'cut with a knife', 'write with a pen'). In this sentence, the 'axe' is the tool used to fell the tree, making 'with' the grammatically correct choice.
2. 'By' is typically used to indicate the agent (the person or thing performing the action) or the method/means of transport (e.g., 'felled by a lumberjack', 'travel by bus'). While 'by' can sometimes denote means, when a specific physical tool is mentioned, 'with' is the standard preposition.
3. 'Of' is used to show possession, origin, or composition (e.g., 'a tree of oak'), which does not fit the context of using a tool.
4. 'In' is used for location, time, or manner, which is not applicable here.
This is a junior school. (Identify the part of speech of 'junior')
A)
Noun
B)
Pronoun
C)
Adverb
D)
Adjective
Step-by-step analysis: 1. Identify the word in question: 'junior'. 2. Analyze its position in the sentence: 'This is a junior school.' 3. Determine what it is modifying: The word 'junior' is placed immediately before the noun 'school'. 4. Define the function: Since 'junior' describes or qualifies the noun 'school' (specifying what kind of school it is), it functions as an adjective.
Why other options are incorrect:
- (a) Noun: A noun names a person, place, thing, or idea. While 'junior' can be a noun in other contexts (e.g., 'He is a junior'), here it describes the school.
- (b) Pronoun: A pronoun replaces a noun (e.g., he, she, it). 'Junior' does not replace a noun here.
- (c) Adverb: An adverb modifies a verb, adjective, or another adverb. 'Junior' is modifying a noun, not a verb or adjective.
His birthday is ___ next Sunday.
A)
in
B)
at
C)
on
D)
for
Option C is correct: on.
Contemporary economic development differs ___ from the Industrial Revolution of the 19th Century.
A)
naturally
B)
literally
C)
usually
D)
markedly
The sentence requires an adverb that describes the degree or manner in which contemporary economic development differs from the Industrial Revolution.
1. **Analysis of 'markedly' (Option d):** 'Markedly' means 'to a significant or noticeable extent.' In the context of comparing two different eras of economic development (the 19th century vs. the contemporary era), it is logically sound to state that they differ significantly. This is the most appropriate colocation for the verb 'differs'.
2. **Analysis of other options:**
- **Naturally (Option a):** This implies that the difference occurs as a matter of course or by nature. While it might be true, it doesn't describe the *extent* of the difference, which is the primary focus of such a comparison.
- **Literally (Option b):** This is used to emphasize that something is exactly true in a literal sense, rather than metaphorically. It does not fit the context of comparing economic trends.
- **Usually (Option c):** This refers to frequency or habit. Economic development doesn't 'usually' differ; it either differs or it doesn't in a specific comparison.
Therefore, 'markedly' is the only option that provides the necessary emphasis on the distinct contrast between the two periods.
Every seat was occupied. (Identify the part of speech of 'Every')
A)
Pronoun
B)
Preposition
C)
Adjective
D)
Noun
In the sentence 'Every seat was occupied', the word 'Every' is used to modify the noun 'seat'. Specifically, it is a 'Distributive Adjective' because it refers to each individual member of a group separately.
Step-by-step analysis:
1. Identify the word in question: 'Every'.
2. Identify the word it is modifying: 'seat' (a noun).
3. Determine the function: Since 'Every' describes or limits the noun 'seat' by specifying quantity/distribution, it functions as an adjective.
Why other options are incorrect:
- a. Pronoun: A pronoun replaces a noun. If the sentence were 'Every one was occupied', 'Every one' (or 'Everyone') would act as a pronoun. Here, it is followed immediately by the noun it modifies.
- b. Preposition: A preposition shows the relationship between a noun/pronoun and another part of the sentence (e.g., in, on, at). 'Every' does not perform this function.
- d. Noun: A noun is a person, place, thing, or idea. 'Every' cannot stand alone as a subject or object in this context; it is a modifier.
We eat that we may live. (Identify the part of speech of 'that')
A)
Preposition
B)
Adjective
C)
Pronoun
D)
Conjunction
Step-by-step analysis: 1. Analyze the sentence structure: 'We eat' is the main clause, and 'we may live' is a subordinate clause. 2. Identify the role of 'that': In this context, 'that' connects the main clause to the subordinate clause to express a purpose (meaning 'so that' or 'in order that'). 3. Determine the part of speech: A word that joins two clauses or sentences is called a conjunction. Specifically, this is a subordinating conjunction of purpose. 4. Evaluate other options: (a) Preposition: It does not show a relationship of position or time between a noun and another part of the sentence. (b) Adjective: It does not modify a noun (it is not a demonstrative adjective like 'that book'). (c) Pronoun: It does not replace a noun (it is not a relative pronoun here because it doesn't refer back to a specific antecedent noun to describe it; rather, it introduces a purpose clause).
___ you show me the road to the market?
A)
Might
B)
Should
C)
Shall
D)
Could
The sentence is a request for assistance. In English grammar, 'Could' is used as a polite and formal way to make a request or ask for a favor.
Analysis of options:
- 'Could' (Option d): Correct. It is the standard modal used for polite requests (e.g., 'Could you help me?').
- 'Might' (Option a): Incorrect. While 'might' can be used for very formal requests, it is typically used for permission ('Might I suggest...') rather than asking someone else to perform an action.
- 'Should' (Option b): Incorrect. 'Should' is used for advice, obligation, or expectation, not for making a request for directions.
- 'Shall' (Option c): Incorrect. 'Shall' is used for offers ('Shall I help you?') or future intentions, primarily with 'I' or 'We', and is not used to ask someone else to show the way in this context.
The room is nice, though small. (Identify the notion/concept expressed)
A)
concession
B)
condition
C)
comparison
D)
result
The sentence 'The room is nice, though small' uses the conjunction 'though' to connect two contrasting ideas: the positive attribute ('nice') and the negative or limiting attribute ('small'). In grammar, a 'concession' occurs when a point is admitted or granted (the room is small), but the main point remains true regardless (the room is still nice). This is a classic example of a concessive clause.
Why other options are incorrect:
- b. Condition: A conditional sentence usually uses 'if' or 'unless' to specify a requirement for an outcome (e.g., 'If the room is small, it will be cheap').
- c. Comparison: A comparison evaluates similarities or differences using words like 'than', 'as...as', or 'more' (e.g., 'This room is smaller than the other').
- d. Result: A result expresses the consequence of an action, often using 'so' or 'therefore' (e.g., 'The room was small, so we couldn't fit the bed').
A plane is hovering ___ the field.
A)
on
B)
above
C)
after
D)
among
The sentence requires a preposition of place to describe the position of a plane relative to a field.
1. **Analysis of 'hovering'**: To 'hover' means to remain poised suspended in one place in the air. This implies a vertical gap between the object (the plane) and the surface (the field).
2. **Evaluating 'above' (Option b)**: 'Above' is used when an object is at a higher level than another, without necessarily being directly over it or touching it. Since a plane stays in the air while hovering, 'above' is the grammatically and logically correct choice.
3. **Evaluating 'on' (Option a)**: 'On' implies physical contact with the surface. A plane cannot 'hover' if it is resting 'on' the field.
4. **Evaluating 'after' (Option c)**: 'After' is primarily a preposition of time or sequence, not a spatial preposition describing vertical position.
5. **Evaluating 'among' (Option d)**: 'Among' is used when referring to being in the middle of three or more distinct items. A field is a single area, not a group of separate entities.
Yesterday, she ___ for her lost dog since morning.
A)
searched
B)
had search
C)
had searched
D)
was searching
The sentence describes an action that started in the past ('since morning') and continued up until another point in the past ('Yesterday'). This specific timeline requires the Past Perfect tense (or Past Perfect Continuous).
1. **Analysis of Tense**: The phrase 'since morning' indicates a duration of time. When an action began in the past and continued up to a specific point in the past, we use the Past Perfect tense (had + past participle).
2. **Evaluating Options**:
- **a. searched**: This is Simple Past. While it indicates a past action, it does not correctly align with the duration marker 'since morning' in this context.
- **b. had search**: This is grammatically incorrect. The auxiliary 'had' must be followed by the past participle ('searched'), not the base form ('search').
- **c. had searched**: This is the correct Past Perfect form. It indicates that the searching happened over a period of time leading up to the point of reference (yesterday).
- **d. was searching**: This is Past Continuous. While it describes an ongoing action, 'since morning' typically triggers a perfect tense to emphasize the duration from a starting point.
My mother said to me, “Are you going to school today?” (Choose the correct Indirect Speech)
A)
My mother asked me are you going to school today.
B)
My mother asked me if I was going to school that day.
C)
My mother asked me if I was going to school today.
D)
My mother asked me if I am going to school today.
To convert the direct speech 'My mother said to me, “Are you going to school today?”' into indirect speech, we must follow these grammatical rules:
1. **Reporting Verb**: Since the direct speech is a question, 'said to' changes to 'asked'.
2. **Connector**: For Yes/No questions (questions starting with an auxiliary verb like 'Are'), we use 'if' or 'whether' as the connector.
3. **Pronoun Change**: The second-person pronoun 'you' refers to the object 'me', so it changes to 'I'.
4. **Tense Change**: The direct speech is in the Present Continuous tense ('Are you going'). According to the rules of sequence of tenses, since the reporting verb ('said') is in the past, the present continuous changes to the Past Continuous ('was going').
5. **Time Expression**: The word 'today' changes to 'that day' in indirect speech to reflect the shift in time perspective.
Evaluating the options:
- Option (a) is incorrect because it fails to use a connector ('if') and does not change the tense or time expression.
- Option (b) is correct as it correctly applies all the rules: 'asked', 'if', 'I was going', and 'that day'.
- Option (c) is incorrect because it fails to change 'today' to 'that day'.
- Option (d) is incorrect because it fails to change the tense ('am' instead of 'was') and the time expression ('today' instead of 'that day').
He was annoyed that he was contradicted. (Identify the notion/concept expressed)
A)
condition
B)
purpose
C)
reason
D)
possibility
The sentence 'He was annoyed that he was contradicted' consists of a main clause ('He was annoyed') and a subordinate clause ('that he was contradicted'). In this context, the 'that' clause functions as a noun clause acting as an adjective complement, explaining the cause or the reason for his annoyance. Essentially, the sentence means: 'He was annoyed because he was contradicted.'
Analysis of options:
- (a) Condition: There is no 'if' or 'unless' structure indicating a requirement for an outcome.
- (b) Purpose: There is no 'so that' or 'in order to' indicating an intention or goal.
- (c) Reason: The clause explains why the subject felt a certain emotion (annoyance), making it a statement of cause/reason.
- (d) Possibility: There are no modal verbs like 'might', 'may', or 'could' to suggest uncertainty or potential.
I wish he ___ not play music so loudly.
A)
should
B)
will
C)
would
D)
ought
The sentence expresses a wish for someone else's behavior to change, which is a common use of the 'wish + would' construction. In English grammar, when we use 'wish' to express annoyance or a desire for a change in a situation or another person's habit (especially something that is irritating), we use 'would' + base verb.
1. 'Would' is used here to express a wish for a change in behavior (stopping the loud music).
2. 'Should' (Option a) is used for advice or obligation, but not typically following 'I wish' to express a desire for change in this context.
3. 'Will' (Option b) is used for future certainty or willingness, but after 'wish', the tense must shift to the subjunctive/past form ('would').
4. 'Ought' (Option d) requires 'to' (ought to) to be grammatically correct and expresses moral obligation, which does not fit the structure of a 'wish' clause.
He received a summons today. (Identify the part of speech of 'summons')
A)
Adverb
B)
Pronoun
C)
Noun
D)
Verb
Step-by-step reasoning:
1. **Analyze the sentence structure**: In the sentence 'He received a summons today', 'He' is the subject, 'received' is the transitive verb, and 'a summons' is the direct object of the verb.
2. **Identify the marker**: The word 'summons' is preceded by the indefinite article 'a'. In English grammar, articles (a, an, the) are used to introduce nouns or noun phrases.
3. **Define the word**: In this context, 'summons' refers to an official order to appear in a court of law. It is a thing/document, which fits the definition of a noun.
4. **Address common confusion**: Many learners mistake 'summons' for a verb because 'to summon' is a verb. However, 'summons' (ending in -s) is the singular noun form. The plural of the noun 'summons' is 'summonses'.
5. **Evaluate other options**:
- (a) Adverb: It does not modify a verb, adjective, or another adverb.
- (b) Pronoun: It does not replace a noun; it is the name of the object itself.
- (d) Verb: While 'summon' is a verb, in this sentence, the action is 'received'. 'Summons' is the object being received, not the action being performed.
The case was put ___ the judge within a week.
A)
through
B)
from
C)
by
D)
before
The sentence requires a preposition that describes the act of presenting a legal matter to a person of authority. In legal terminology, when a case, petition, or appeal is presented to a judge or a court for consideration, the standard preposition used is 'before'. To 'put a case before someone' means to present the facts of the case to them for a decision.
Analysis of other options:
- 'through' (a): 'Put through' usually means to connect someone via telephone or to make someone experience something difficult; it does not fit the context of presenting a case to a judge.
- 'from' (b): 'Put from' is not a standard phrasal verb or prepositional usage in this context.
- 'by' (c): While a case is decided 'by' a judge, it is not 'put by' a judge unless the judge was the one initiating the action, which contradicts the logic of presenting a case for judgment.
Take the raincoat as it ___ rain later.
A)
might
B)
would
C)
should
D)
must
The sentence describes a possibility of a future event (rain) that is uncertain.
1. 'Might' is used to express a weak or remote possibility. In this context, the speaker is suggesting taking a raincoat because there is a chance it will rain, though it is not certain. This is the most natural and grammatically correct choice for weather predictions based on possibility.
2. 'Would' is typically used for conditional sentences or habitual past actions, which does not fit the context of a future possibility here.
3. 'Should' expresses expectation or obligation. While 'it should rain' is grammatically possible, it implies a strong expectation that rain is scheduled or likely to happen, which contradicts the cautionary nature of 'Take the raincoat' (which is usually a precaution against a possibility).
4. 'Must' expresses strong necessity or a logical certainty. It is too strong for a weather prediction in this context, as one cannot be 100% certain it will rain later.
He held my hand lest I should fall. (Identify the notion/concept expressed)
A)
condition
B)
purpose
C)
supposition
D)
comparison
The sentence 'He held my hand lest I should fall' uses the conjunction 'lest'. In English grammar, 'lest' is used to express a negative purpose; it means 'for fear that' or 'to avoid the risk of'. The action of holding the hand was performed for the specific purpose of preventing the person from falling. Therefore, the clause 'lest I should fall' is an adverbial clause of purpose.
Why other options are incorrect:
- a. Condition: A conditional sentence usually uses 'if' or 'unless' to specify a requirement for an outcome.
- c. Supposition: Supposition involves imagining a scenario (often using 'as if' or 'suppose'), which is not the case here.
- d. Comparison: Comparison involves showing similarities or differences (using 'than', 'as...as', or 'like'), which is not present in this sentence.
Put these books on the shelf above. (Identify the part of speech of 'above')
A)
Conjunction
B)
Pronoun
C)
Adverb
D)
Preposition
To determine the part of speech of 'above' in the sentence 'Put these books on the shelf above,' we must look at its function in the sentence.
1. **Analysis of 'above'**: In this sentence, 'above' modifies the noun 'shelf' by describing its location. Specifically, it functions as an adverb of place, answering the question 'Which shelf?' or 'Where is the shelf?'.
2. **Distinction from Preposition**: A preposition requires an object (a noun or pronoun) to follow it to create a prepositional phrase (e.g., 'The books are above the shelf'). In the given sentence, 'above' is not followed by an object; it stands alone to modify the position of the shelf. When 'above' is used without a following object to indicate location, it functions as an adverb.
3. **Evaluating other options**:
- **Conjunction**: A conjunction connects words, phrases, or clauses (e.g., 'and', 'but'). 'Above' does not perform this function here.
- **Pronoun**: A pronoun replaces a noun (e.g., 'he', 'it'). 'Above' does not replace a noun here.
- **Preposition**: As noted, there is no object following 'above' in this sentence, so it cannot be a preposition.
I am better acquainted with the country than you are (Identify the notion/concept expressed)
A)
result
B)
reason
C)
purpose
D)
comparison
The sentence 'I am better acquainted with the country than you are' uses a comparative structure to evaluate the degree of knowledge between two subjects ('I' and 'you').
1. **Analysis of the sentence**: The word 'better' is the comparative form of the adjective 'well' (or 'good'), and the word 'than' is a conjunction used specifically to introduce the second element in a comparison.
2. **Why 'comparison' is correct**: The sentence compares the level of acquaintance one person has with a country relative to another person. This is a classic example of a comparative degree of adjective.
3. **Why other options are incorrect**:
- **Result**: A result clause typically uses words like 'so... that' or 'therefore' to show the consequence of an action (e.g., 'I studied hard, so I passed').
- **Reason**: A reason clause explains why something happened, typically using 'because', 'since', or 'as' (e.g., 'I am acquainted with the country because I lived there').
- **Purpose**: A purpose clause explains the goal of an action, typically using 'so that', 'in order to', or 'for' (e.g., 'I visited the country to get acquainted with it').
Before pursuing entrepreneurship, Mary ___ very hard in IT domain.
A)
had worked
B)
had been working
C)
has worked
D)
worked
Step-by-step reasoning: 1. Analyze the sentence structure: The sentence describes two events in the past. Event A is 'pursuing entrepreneurship' and Event B is 'working in the IT domain'. 2. Sequence of events: The word 'Before' indicates that the working in the IT domain happened prior to the pursuit of entrepreneurship. 3. Duration and Continuity: The phrase 'very hard' suggests a continuous effort or a period of duration leading up to the change in career. 4. Tense Selection: When an action was ongoing over a period of time up until another point in the past, the Past Perfect Continuous tense ('had been' + verb-ing) is the most appropriate choice to emphasize the duration and the process. 5. Evaluating options: (a) 'had worked' (Past Perfect) is grammatically possible but focuses on the completion of the act rather than the continuous effort. (b) 'had been working' (Past Perfect Continuous) best captures the ongoing nature of the hard work before the transition. (c) 'has worked' (Present Perfect) is incorrect because the context is set in the past. (d) 'worked' (Simple Past) does not sufficiently emphasize the sequence or the duration relative to the second past event.
___ come to my rescue, I would have been killed.
A)
If he had not
B)
If he did not
C)
Having not
D)
If he would not
This sentence is a Third Conditional sentence, which is used to describe a hypothetical situation in the past and its imaginary result. The structure of a Third Conditional sentence is: 'If + Past Perfect (had + past participle), ... would have + past participle'.
1. Analysis of the result clause: 'I would have been killed' follows the 'would have + past participle' structure, indicating a past unreal condition.
2. Analysis of the if-clause: To match this, the if-clause must be in the Past Perfect tense. 'If he had not come' fits this requirement perfectly.
Why other options are incorrect:
- Option (b) 'If he did not' is Simple Past, which is used for Second Conditionals (present/future hypotheticals).
- Option (c) 'Having not' is grammatically incomplete and does not form a conditional clause.
- Option (d) 'If he would not' is grammatically incorrect because 'would' is not used in the 'if' clause of a conditional sentence.
He is rich enough to maintain a car. (Identify the part of speech of 'enough')
A)
Adverb
B)
Adjective
C)
Conjunction
D)
Pronoun
Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Analyze the sentence structure: 'He is rich enough to maintain a car.'
2. Identify the word being modified: The word 'enough' follows the word 'rich'.
3. Determine the part of speech of 'rich': In this sentence, 'rich' is an adjective describing the subject 'He'.
4. Apply grammatical rules: A word that modifies an adjective, a verb, or another adverb is classified as an adverb. Since 'enough' is modifying the adjective 'rich' (indicating the degree of richness), it functions as an adverb of degree.
5. Distinguish from Adjective usage: 'Enough' acts as an adjective only when it modifies a noun (e.g., 'I have enough money'). In this sentence, it does not modify a noun.
6. Eliminate other options: It is not a conjunction because it doesn't join clauses; it is not a pronoun because it doesn't replace a noun.
Therefore, 'enough' is an adverb.
Tim said, “I had worked late last night.” (Choose the correct Indirect Speech)
A)
Tim said that he had worked late last night.
B)
Tim said that he had worked late the previous night.
C)
Tim said he was working late last night.
D)
Tim said that he is working late last night.
To convert the sentence from Direct to Indirect speech, we must follow these grammatical rules:
1. **Tense Change**: The direct speech is in the Past Perfect tense ('had worked'). According to the rules of sequence of tenses, the Past Perfect remains unchanged when converted to indirect speech because there is no 'further back' tense to shift to.
2. **Pronoun Change**: The first-person pronoun 'I' refers to the speaker (Tim), so it changes to the third-person pronoun 'he'.
3. **Time Expression Change**: Words expressing nearness in time or place are changed to words expressing distance. 'Last night' must be changed to 'the previous night' or 'the night before'.
Evaluating the options:
- **Option a**: Incorrect because it retains 'last night' instead of changing it to 'the previous night'.
- **Option b**: Correct. It correctly changes the pronoun ('he'), maintains the Past Perfect tense ('had worked'), and correctly updates the time expression ('the previous night').
- **Option c**: Incorrect. It changes the tense to Past Continuous ('was working'), which alters the original meaning.
- **Option d**: Incorrect. It uses the Present Continuous ('is working'), which is grammatically incorrect following the reporting verb 'said'.
We chose to ___ our views in the light of the new information.
A)
disclose
B)
revive
C)
diagnose
D)
revise
The sentence describes a situation where 'new information' has come to light, which typically necessitates a change or update to existing beliefs or opinions.
1. **Revise (Correct):** To 'revise' means to re-examine and make alterations to something (like a view, a plan, or a document) to improve it or bring it up to date. This fits the context perfectly: new information leads to a revision of views.
2. **Disclose (Incorrect):** To 'disclose' means to make secret information known. While one can disclose views, the phrase 'in the light of new information' implies a change in perspective, not merely the act of revealing it.
3. **Revive (Incorrect):** To 'revive' means to bring back to life or consciousness, or to make something popular again. You do not typically 'revive' a view because of new information; you update it.
4. **Diagnose (Incorrect):** To 'diagnose' means to identify the nature of an illness or other problem by examination of the symptoms. This is a medical or technical term and is logically incompatible with 'views'.