← CDPO
Past Questions — 2025
Choose the most appropriate meaning for the idiom: To be close-fisted
A)
To attack someone
B)
To lack warmth or affection
C)
To keep a secret
D)
To be miserly
Option D is correct: To be miserly.
Choose the most appropriate word to fill in the blank: In a ________ gesture, she donated the prize money to charity.
A)
bellicose
B)
voluminous
C)
magnanimous
D)
maleficient
Option C is correct: magnanimous.
Transform the following sentence into an Assertive sentence without changing its meaning: 'O that I may see her again!'
A)
O I wish that I may see her again.
B)
That I may see her again.
C)
I wonder if I will see her again.
D)
I wish that I may see her again.
Option D is correct: I wish that I may see her again..
Transform the following sentence into a Negative sentence without changing its meaning: 'It is possible that I may have been mistaken.'
A)
It is not possible that I may have been mistaken
B)
It is possible that I may have not been mistaken
C)
It is impossible that I may have been mistaken
D)
It is not impossible that I may have been mistaken
Option D is correct: It is not impossible that I may have been mistaken.
Fill in the blank with the appropriate form of the verb: We _____ (drive) all the way to the resort, only for it to be closed.
A)
drive
B)
were driving
C)
drove
D)
will drive
Option C is correct: drove.
Fill in the blank with the appropriate preposition/adverb: We must treat everyone equally, irrespective _____ race, class or gender.
A)
on
B)
to
C)
by
D)
of
Option D is correct: of.
Transform the following sentence into an Affirmative sentence without changing its meaning: 'I was not at all sure of your success.'
A)
I was sure of your success
B)
I was doubtful of your success
C)
I was at all sure of your success
D)
I was unenthusiastic of your success
Option B is correct: I was doubtful of your success.
Identify the underlined part of the sentence: 'Tell me what happened yesterday.' (Underlined: what happened yesterday)
A)
Noun Clause
B)
Adjective Clause
C)
Adverb Clause
D)
Adverb Phrase
Option A is correct: Noun Clause.
Identify the part of speech in the underlined word: Puia himself stood up and spoke in favour of the proposal, but it was of no use. (Underlined: himself)
A)
Adverb
B)
Noun
C)
Adjective
D)
Pronoun
Step-by-step reasoning:
1. **Analyze the word**: The word 'himself' is used to refer back to the subject 'Puia'.
2. **Identify the category**: Words that replace or refer back to nouns are categorized as pronouns. Specifically, 'himself' is an **Emphatic Pronoun** (or Intensive Pronoun) in this sentence because it is used to emphasize that Puia personally stood up, rather than someone else doing it for him.
3. **Evaluate other options**:
- **Adverb**: Adverbs modify verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs (e.g., 'quickly', 'very'). 'Himself' does not modify the action of standing up; it identifies the person.
- **Noun**: A noun is a name of a person, place, or thing. While 'Puia' is a noun, 'himself' is a word that refers back to that noun.
- **Adjective**: Adjectives describe or modify nouns (e.g., 'tall', 'happy'). 'Himself' does not describe a quality of Puia; it serves as a referential pronoun.
Therefore, 'himself' is a pronoun.
Fill in the blank with the appropriate form of the verb in brackets: It ______ (rain) when he came over this morning.
A)
has rained
B)
rains
C)
is raining
D)
was raining
The sentence describes two actions occurring in the past: one action was ongoing (the rain) when another shorter action interrupted it or occurred during that time (he came over). This structure requires the Past Continuous tense for the ongoing action and the Simple Past tense for the interrupting action.
1. 'came over' is in the Simple Past, establishing the timeframe as the past.
2. The action of raining was already in progress at that specific moment in the past, necessitating the Past Continuous form: 'was/were + verb-ing'.
3. Since 'It' is a singular subject, 'was raining' is the correct form.
Analysis of other options:
- (a) 'has rained' (Present Perfect) is incorrect because it cannot be used to describe a continuous action interrupted by a Simple Past event.
- (b) 'rains' (Simple Present) is incorrect as it describes a general habit or fact, not a specific past event.
- (c) 'is raining' (Present Continuous) is incorrect because the sentence is set in the past ('came over').
Identify the underlined part of the sentence: The man wearing a red hat is my uncle. (Underlined: wearing a red hat)
A)
Noun Clause
B)
Adverb Phrase
C)
Adjective phrase
D)
Adjective clause
Step-by-step analysis:
1. **Analyze the underlined part**: 'wearing a red hat'.
2. **Determine if it is a Phrase or a Clause**: A clause must contain both a subject and a finite verb. 'Wearing' is a present participle (non-finite verb), and there is no subject within this specific group of words. Therefore, it is a **phrase**, not a clause. This eliminates options (a) and (d).
3. **Determine the function**: The phrase 'wearing a red hat' describes or modifies the noun 'The man'.
4. **Identify the type of phrase**: A phrase that modifies a noun is called an **adjective phrase** (specifically, a participial phrase acting as an adjective).
5. **Evaluate other options**: It is not an adverb phrase because it does not modify a verb, adjective, or another adverb to indicate time, place, manner, or reason; it specifically identifies which man is being discussed. Thus, option (c) is the correct answer.
Choose the correct word to connect the following sentences: I shall do it ________ you asked me to.
A)
when
B)
so that
C)
before
D)
since
The sentence requires a conjunction that establishes a causal relationship between the action ('I shall do it') and the reason for that action ('you asked me to').
1. 'Since' is used here as a causal conjunction meaning 'because' or 'given that'. It explains the reason why the speaker is going to perform the action: 'I shall do it because you asked me to.'
2. 'When' (Option a) refers to time. While grammatically possible, it implies the action happens at the exact moment of the request, which is logically less likely than doing it because of the request.
3. 'So that' (Option b) expresses purpose or result. It would imply the speaker is doing the action in order to make the other person ask, which is logically incorrect in this context.
4. 'Before' (Option c) refers to time sequence. It would imply the action is completed prior to the request, which contradicts the logic of doing something because someone asked for it.
Therefore, 'since' is the most appropriate word to connect the two clauses logically.
Identify the part of speech in the underlined word: He had joined the office two years before his father died. (Underlined: before)
A)
Conjunction
B)
Interjection
C)
Adjective
D)
Preposition
To determine the part of speech of the word 'before' in the sentence 'He had joined the office two years before his father died,' we must look at its function in the sentence structure.
1. **Analysis of the structure**: The word 'before' connects two distinct clauses:
- Clause 1: 'He had joined the office two years' (Independent clause)
- Clause 2: 'his father died' (Dependent clause containing a subject 'his father' and a verb 'died').
2. **Defining a Conjunction**: A conjunction is a word used to connect clauses or sentences. Specifically, 'before' here acts as a subordinating conjunction because it introduces a subordinate clause and establishes a temporal relationship between the two events.
3. **Why it is not a Preposition**: A preposition is followed by a noun or pronoun (an object) without a verb. For example, in 'He arrived before the party,' 'before' is a preposition because 'the party' is just a noun phrase. However, in the given sentence, 'before' is followed by a full clause ('his father died'), which makes it a conjunction.
4. **Why other options are incorrect**:
- **Interjection**: These are words expressing strong emotion (e.g., 'Wow!', 'Alas!'), which does not apply here.
- **Adjective**: Adjectives modify nouns. 'Before' is not describing a noun in this context.
Choose the most appropriate meaning for the idiom: A lone wolf
A)
One who is very violent
B)
A very clumsy person
C)
one who prefers to live alone
D)
one who casts the deciding vote
The idiom 'a lone wolf' refers to a person who avoids the company of others and prefers to act, live, or work independently.
Step-by-step analysis of the options:
- Option (a) 'One who is very violent' is incorrect; while wolves are predators, the idiom 'lone wolf' describes social behavior, not temperament or aggression.
- Option (b) 'A very clumsy person' is incorrect; there is no linguistic or metaphorical link between a lone wolf and clumsiness.
- Option (c) 'one who prefers to live alone' is correct; this directly aligns with the definition of the idiom, describing an introvert or someone who chooses solitude.
- Option (d) 'one who casts the deciding vote' is incorrect; this describes a 'casting vote' or a 'tie-breaker,' which is unrelated to the idiom.
Identify the underlined part of the sentence: To err is human, but to forgive is divine. (Underlined: To err)
A)
Adverbial Phrase
B)
Adjective phrase
C)
Noun phrase
D)
Adjective clause
Step-by-step reasoning:
1. **Analyze the structure**: The underlined part 'To err' is an infinitive phrase (the base form of the verb preceded by 'to').
2. **Determine the function**: In the sentence 'To err is human', the phrase 'To err' acts as the subject of the verb 'is'.
3. **Identify the part of speech**: In English grammar, any word or group of words that functions as the subject of a sentence is acting as a noun. Therefore, an infinitive phrase used as a subject is a Noun Phrase.
4. **Evaluate other options**:
- (a) Adverbial Phrases modify verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs (answering how, when, where, or why), which is not the case here.
- (b) Adjective Phrases modify nouns or pronouns, which is not the case here.
- (d) An Adjective Clause must contain a subject and a predicate and modify a noun; 'To err' lacks a subject-predicate structure and does not modify a noun.
Transform the following sentence to Negative without changing its meaning: It is possible that I may have been mistaken.
A)
It is not possible that I may have been mistaken
B)
It is possible that I may have not been mistaken
C)
It is impossible that I may have been mistaken
D)
It is not impossible that I may have been mistaken
The goal of sentence transformation to a negative form without changing the meaning is to use a 'double negative' or an antonym with a negative particle.
1. Original Sentence: 'It is possible that I may have been mistaken.' (Meaning: There is a chance that I was wrong).
2. Analysis of Options:
- Option (a) 'It is not possible...' directly contradicts the original meaning.
- Option (b) '...may have not been mistaken' changes the meaning to suggest the possibility of being correct.
- Option (c) 'It is impossible...' is the opposite of the original meaning.
- Option (d) 'It is not impossible...' uses the double negative ('not' + 'impossible'). Since 'impossible' means 'not possible', saying it is 'not impossible' is logically equivalent to saying it 'is possible'.
Therefore, option (d) preserves the original meaning while transforming the sentence into a negative structure.
Choose the most appropriate word to fill in the blank: He has been found ________ for this post due to canvassing.
A)
ineligible
B)
indelible
C)
inedible
D)
intelligible
Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Analyze the context: The sentence mentions a person being considered for a 'post' (a job or position) and mentions 'canvassing' (the act of attempting to influence a decision through unofficial or unfair means).
2. Evaluate the options based on meaning:
- 'Ineligible' means not meeting the required conditions or not permitted to do something. In a professional context, if someone engages in unfair practices like canvassing, they are often disqualified or deemed 'ineligible' for the position.
- 'Indelible' means making marks that cannot be removed (e.g., indelible ink). This does not fit the context of job qualification.
- 'Inedible' means not fit to be eaten. This is irrelevant to a job post.
- 'Intelligible' means able to be understood. While a person can be intelligible, it does not logically follow the consequence of 'canvassing' for a post.
3. Conclusion: 'Ineligible' is the only word that logically completes the sentence, indicating that the person is no longer qualified or permitted to hold the post due to their actions.
Choose the correct word to connect the following sentences: I shall help him _______ he does not deserve it.
A)
though
B)
for
C)
since
D)
if
The sentence presents a contrast between two opposing ideas: the act of helping someone and the fact that the person does not deserve that help. To connect two clauses that express a contradiction or concession, we use a concessive conjunction.
1. 'Though' (Option a) is a concessive conjunction used to introduce a statement that makes the main statement surprising. It fits perfectly here: 'I shall help him (action) though he does not deserve it (contradictory fact).'
2. 'For' (Option b) is used as a coordinating conjunction meaning 'because'. It would imply that the reason for helping him is that he doesn't deserve it, which is logically unsound.
3. 'Since' (Option c) is used to indicate a cause or a point in time. Similar to 'for', it would imply that his lack of merit is the reason for the help, which is illogical.
4. 'If' (Option d) is a conditional conjunction. This would imply that the help is dependent on him not deserving it, which does not fit the intended meaning of the sentence.
Choose the most appropriate meaning for the idiom: To hold one’s tongue
A)
To flatter someone
B)
To keep silent
C)
To lie blatantly
D)
To argue with someone
The idiom 'to hold one's tongue' literally suggests the act of physically preventing the tongue from moving to speak. Figuratively, it means to consciously decide not to speak, especially to avoid saying something that might be offensive, inappropriate, or reveal a secret.
Analysis of options:
- Option (a) 'To flatter someone' refers to praising someone excessively to gain favor, which is not related to silence.
- Option (b) 'To keep silent' is the precise definition of the idiom.
- Option (c) 'To lie blatantly' refers to speaking untruths openly, which is the opposite of holding one's tongue.
- Option (d) 'To argue with someone' involves active speaking and disagreement, whereas the idiom describes the absence of speaking.
Choose the most appropriate word to fill in the blank: You must consult only _______ sources for your research.
A)
credible
B)
conceivable
C)
incredible
D)
inconceivable
The sentence describes a requirement for conducting research. In academic or professional research, it is essential to use sources that are trustworthy, reliable, and believable.
1. 'Credible' means able to be believed; convincing or reliable. This fits the context perfectly as research requires reliable data.
2. 'Conceivable' means capable of being imagined or grasped mentally. While a source can be conceivable, it does not imply the reliability needed for research.
3. 'Incredible' usually means impossible to believe or extraordinary. In a research context, an 'incredible' source would be one that is not believable, which is the opposite of what is required.
4. 'Inconceivable' means not capable of being imagined. This is logically incorrect in the context of selecting research sources.
Therefore, 'credible' is the only logically and contextually appropriate choice.
Fill in the blank with the appropriate form of the verb in brackets: He ______ (prefer) his wife to stay at home.
A)
prefer
B)
is preferring
C)
prefers
D)
has preferred
Step-by-step reasoning: 1. Subject-Verb Agreement: The subject 'He' is a third-person singular pronoun. In the Simple Present Tense, the verb must take an '-s' or '-es' suffix (e.g., He prefers). 2. Stative Verbs: The verb 'prefer' is a stative verb, which describes a state of mind, a preference, or a feeling. Stative verbs are generally not used in the continuous/progressive form (e.g., 'is preferring' is grammatically incorrect in standard English). 3. Tense Selection: The sentence expresses a general preference or a habitual state, making the Simple Present Tense the most appropriate choice. 4. Analysis of options: (a) 'prefer' is for plural subjects or 'I/You'; (b) 'is preferring' violates the rule for stative verbs; (d) 'has preferred' (Present Perfect) would require a specific context of time or a completed action leading to the present, which is not indicated here. Therefore, 'prefers' is the correct form.
Choose the most appropriate word to fill in the blank: The country was a ______, ruled by a queen.
A)
matricide
B)
matrilineal
C)
matrimony
D)
monarchy
The sentence describes a country ruled by a single sovereign (a queen).
1. **Monarchy (Option d):** A form of government in which a single person (the monarch), such as a king or queen, serves as the head of state. This fits the context perfectly.
2. **Matricide (Option a):** The act of killing one's own mother. This is completely irrelevant to the context of governance.
3. **Matrilineal (Option b):** Relating to a social system in which kinship and inheritance are traced through the female line. While it relates to women, it describes a system of lineage, not a system of government/rule.
4. **Matrimony (Option c):** The state or ceremony of being married. This does not describe a type of country or government.
Therefore, 'monarchy' is the only logically and grammatically correct word to fill the blank.
Identify the part of the sentence that contains an error: (a) They appointed / (b) him as a manager / (c) as he is efficient. / (d) No error.
A)
(a)
B)
(b)
C)
(c)
D)
(d)
The error in this sentence is one of 'Tense Consistency'.
1. Analysis of Part (a): 'They appointed' is in the Simple Past Tense. This establishes the time frame of the action as having occurred in the past.
2. Analysis of Part (b): 'him as a manager' is grammatically correct as it identifies the role he was appointed to.
3. Analysis of Part (c): 'as he is efficient' uses the Simple Present Tense ('is').
According to the rules of sequence of tenses, if the main clause of a sentence is in the past tense, the subordinate clause should also be in the past tense to maintain consistency, unless the subordinate clause expresses a universal truth or a permanent fact. While efficiency might be a trait, in the context of an appointment that happened in the past, the reason for that appointment must also be framed in the past.
Therefore, 'is' should be replaced with 'was' to match the past tense of 'appointed'.
Correct Sentence: 'They appointed him as a manager as he was efficient.'
Identify the part of speech in the underlined word: He proclaimed his love for Estella in front of everyone. (Underlined: proclaimed)
A)
Noun
B)
Adjective
C)
Verb
D)
Preposition
Step-by-step reasoning: 1. Analyze the sentence structure: 'He' is the subject, 'proclaimed' is the action being performed, and 'his love for Estella' is the direct object. 2. Define the underlined word: 'Proclaimed' means to announce officially or publicly. In this context, it describes the action taken by the subject ('He'). 3. Identify the part of speech: A word that expresses an action, an occurrence, or a state of being is classified as a verb. 4. Evaluate other options: (a) Noun: 'Proclaimed' is not a person, place, thing, or idea. (b) Adjective: It does not modify or describe a noun. (d) Preposition: It does not show a relationship of time, place, or direction between a noun and another part of the sentence. Therefore, 'proclaimed' is a verb.
Identify the part of speech in the underlined word: What a piece of work is man! (Underlined: What)
A)
Adverb
B)
Conjunction
C)
Adjective
D)
Preposition
Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Analyze the sentence structure: 'What a piece of work is man!' is an exclamatory sentence (originally from Shakespeare's Hamlet).
2. Identify the function of 'What': In this context, 'What' is not being used to ask a question (interrogative pronoun) but to emphasize the quality or extent of the noun phrase 'a piece of work'.
3. Determine the part of speech: When 'what' is used in exclamatory sentences to modify a noun or noun phrase (acting as a determiner), it functions as an exclamatory adjective. It describes the 'piece of work' by adding emphasis to its nature.
4. Evaluate other options:
- (a) Adverb: It does not modify a verb, adjective, or another adverb.
- (b) Conjunction: It is not connecting two clauses or phrases.
- (d) Preposition: It does not show a relationship of place, time, or direction between a noun and another part of the sentence.