Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Repeat offenders under NDPS Act may face:
A)
A warning
B)
Higher punishments
C)
Immunity from punishment
D)
Bail without conditions
Option B is correct: Higher punishments.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
The Act allows liquor consumption with permit.
A)
True
B)
False
C)
Depends on age
D)
If prescribed by physicians only
The Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, establishes a general prohibition on the manufacture, sale, and consumption of liquor within the state. However, the Act is not an absolute ban; it provides specific legal mechanisms for exceptions. Under the provisions of the Act, the government empowers the competent authority to grant 'permits' for the consumption of liquor under specific circumstances (such as medical grounds, religious rites, or for persons from outside the state/foreigners). Therefore, the statement that the Act allows liquor consumption with a permit is legally accurate.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Who notifies the Enforcement Officers?
A)
Governor
B)
Excise Commissioner
C)
State Government
D)
Parliament
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, the power to appoint and notify officers for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of the Act rests with the State Government. Specifically, the State Government notifies individuals as 'Enforcement Officers' to carry out duties such as inspection, seizure, and arrest related to the prohibition of liquor.
- Option (a) Governor: While the Governor is the constitutional head, administrative notifications for officer appointments are issued in the name of the State Government.
- Option (b) Excise Commissioner: The Commissioner manages the administration and execution, but the legal authority to 'notify' the status of an Enforcement Officer is vested in the Government.
- Option (d) Parliament: The Parliament deals with Central Acts; the MLP Act is a state-specific legislation enacted by the Mizoram Legislative Assembly.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Who can try offences under MLP Act 2019:
A)
Judicial Magistrate of the Second Class
B)
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class
C)
Chief Judicial Magistrate only
D)
District & Sessions Judge only
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, the jurisdiction for trying offences is specifically assigned to ensure that the presiding officer has the legal authority to impose the prescribed penalties (fines and imprisonment) associated with the violations of the Act. According to the legal framework of the Act, offences under the MLP Act 2019 are triable by a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class.
- Option (a) is incorrect because a Second Class Magistrate typically has limited sentencing powers that may not cover the maximum penalties prescribed under this specific Act.
- Option (c) and (d) are incorrect because while a CJM or Sessions Judge has the power to try such cases (as they have superior jurisdiction), the Act specifically designates the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class as the primary authority for these trials to ensure efficient judicial administration.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Possession of how much liquor is punishable under the Act?
A)
Any quantity
B)
Above 2 litres
C)
More than 5 bottles
D)
If sold in market
The Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, was enacted to implement a policy of total prohibition of liquor in the state. Under the provisions of this Act, the manufacture, import, export, transport, possession, and sale of liquor are strictly prohibited. Unlike some other state laws that may provide a 'de minimis' threshold (a small amount for personal use), the MLP Act 2019 is designed for total prohibition. Therefore, the possession of liquor in any quantity, regardless of how small, is an offense and is punishable under the Act. Options b, c, and d are incorrect because the law does not set a minimum volume threshold for possession to be considered a crime, nor is the punishment limited only to those selling it in the market.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Who is empowered to search and seize under the Act?
A)
Any person
B)
Only police constables
C)
Village/Local Council members
D)
Authorized Enforcement Officers
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, the power to search, seize, and arrest is not granted to the general public or local council members, nor is it limited solely to police constables. The Act designates specific 'Authorized Officers' or 'Enforcement Officers' (which typically include officers of the Excise & Narcotics Department and designated police officers) who are legally empowered to carry out searches and seizures of prohibited liquor and related materials.
- Option (a) is incorrect because search and seizure are legal powers reserved for state authorities to prevent abuse of power.
- Option (b) is incorrect because while police are involved, the power is vested in 'Authorized Officers' (which includes higher ranks and specific Excise officials), not exclusively constables.
- Option (c) is incorrect because Village/Local Councils do not have statutory powers of search and seizure under this specific Act unless specifically deputized as authorized officers.
- Option (d) is correct as it aligns with the legal framework of the Act which empowers designated enforcement personnel to execute the law.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Storage of seized drugs is regulated under:
A)
Section 55
B)
Section 60
C)
Section 35
D)
Section 70
Option A is correct: Section 55.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
For possession of intermediate quantity, the punishment is:
A)
Up to 6 months
B)
6 months to 1 year
C)
1 to 10 years
D)
Minimum 20 years
Option C is correct: 1 to 10 years.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Punishment under Section 20 relates to:
A)
Cocaine
B)
Cannabis-related offences
C)
Prescription drugs
D)
LSD
Option B is correct: Cannabis-related offences.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Bail under NDPS Act is:
A)
Easily available
B)
Subject to strict conditions under Section 37
C)
Mandatory for all accused
D)
Not applicable
Option B is correct: Subject to strict conditions under Section 37.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
The NDPS Act was enacted in the year:
A)
1980
B)
1985
C)
1995
D)
2000
Option B is correct: 1985.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
The primary objective of the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019 is:
A)
To regulate liquor trade
B)
To prohibit liquor in Mizoram
C)
To promote tourism
D)
To increase revenue collection
The Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019 was enacted by the Government of Mizoram with the primary objective of implementing a total prohibition of liquor within the state. Unlike 'regulation' (which allows controlled sale/consumption) or 'revenue collection' (which relies on excise duties), a 'Prohibition Act' is specifically designed to ban the manufacture, sale, transport, and consumption of alcohol to promote public health and social welfare.
- Option (a) is incorrect because 'regulation' implies legal trade under certain conditions, whereas this Act aims for prohibition.
- Option (c) is incorrect as tourism promotion is not the legal objective of a prohibition law.
- Option (d) is incorrect because prohibition laws typically result in a loss of excise revenue in exchange for social benefits.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Vehicles used for illegal transport of liquor may be:
A)
Released immediately
B)
Confiscated as per law
C)
Exempt from seizure
D)
Registered again automatically
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, the law provides strict penalties to deter the illegal transport, sale, and possession of liquor. When a vehicle is used for the illegal transport of prohibited liquor, it is treated as an instrument of the crime. According to the provisions of the Act, such vehicles are subject to seizure and subsequent confiscation by the competent authority or the court if the offense is proven.
- Option (a) is incorrect because releasing a vehicle used in a crime immediately would defeat the purpose of the prohibition law.
- Option (c) is incorrect because vehicles used for illegal transport are specifically targeted for seizure to prevent further illegal activity.
- Option (d) is incorrect as registration is an administrative process and does not occur 'automatically' as a result of a legal seizure or confiscation process.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
What is the punishment for transporting liquor without license?
A)
No punishment
B)
Same as manufacturing
C)
Warning only
D)
Community service
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, the state has adopted a stringent approach toward the illegal movement of liquor. The Act is designed to prohibit the manufacture, sale, transport, and possession of liquor. According to the penal provisions of the Act, the punishment prescribed for the illegal transportation of liquor without a valid license is aligned with the punishment for illegal manufacturing. This is to ensure that the supply chain (from production to transport) is equally deterred. Therefore, transporting liquor without a license carries the same legal penalties as manufacturing it illegally. Options a, c, and d are incorrect as they do not reflect the statutory penalties prescribed in the Act for such a serious offense.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
What is the Maximum amount of fine which the Commissioner of Excise & Narcotics may impose on a person who committed an offence punishable under Section 5(2), Section 6(3) and Section 7(1) of MLP Act, 2019?
A)
10,000
B)
50,000
C)
5,000
D)
1,000
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, the Act provides for the prohibition of liquor and prescribes penalties for various offences. Specifically, for offences committed under Section 5(2) (possession of liquor), Section 6(3) (sale/transport of liquor), and Section 7(1) (manufacturing of liquor), the Act empowers the Commissioner of Excise & Narcotics to impose a fine in certain administrative or compounding circumstances. According to the statutory provisions regarding the power of the Commissioner to impose fines for these specific sections, the maximum amount of fine that can be imposed is ₹50,000. Options a, c, and d are incorrect as they do not align with the maximum ceiling prescribed in the Act for these specific violations.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Possession of liquor without lawful authority is:
A)
Permitted
B)
Regulated
C)
An offence
D)
Taxable only
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, the state has implemented a prohibition regime. The primary objective of the Act is to prohibit the manufacture, sale, transport, and possession of liquor. According to the legal framework of the Act, any person who possesses liquor without a valid permit or lawful authority granted by the government is committing a violation of the law. Therefore, possession without lawful authority is categorized as a punishable offence.
- Option (a) 'Permitted' is incorrect because the Act is designed to prohibit, not permit, unauthorized possession.
- Option (b) 'Regulated' is incorrect because while the Act regulates certain exemptions, the act of possessing it *without* authority is a breach of law, not a regulated activity.
- Option (d) 'Taxable only' is incorrect because prohibition laws focus on criminal liability and penalties rather than revenue collection through taxation for unauthorized possession.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Who has power to grant bail under this Act?
A)
Any authorised officer
B)
Gazetted Officer
C)
Magistrate
D)
Commissioner
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, as well as the general framework of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) which governs the procedural aspects of arrests and releases in state acts, the power to grant bail is a judicial function. While 'Authorised Officers' (such as Excise officials) have the power to search, seize, and arrest without a warrant under specific sections of the Act, they do not possess the judicial authority to grant bail. Bail is granted by a Magistrate (either the Judicial Magistrate or the Executive Magistrate, depending on the nature of the offense and the specific provisions of the Act) after evaluating the grounds for release. Therefore, option (c) is the only legally correct authority among the choices provided.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Opium is derived from:
A)
Cannabis
B)
Poppy plant
C)
Cocoa
D)
Tobacco
Option B is correct: Poppy plant.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
In which Section under the MLP Act 2019 do you find Power of court to release certain offenders on probation?
A)
Section 42
B)
Section 30
C)
Section 24
D)
Section 54
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, Section 30 specifically deals with the 'Power of court to release certain offenders on probation'. This section allows the court, when sentencing a person for certain offenses under the Act, to release them on probation of good conduct instead of sentencing them to imprisonment, provided the court is satisfied that the offender is a fit candidate for such release.
- Section 24 generally relates to different procedural or penal aspects (such as penalties for specific violations).
- Section 42 and Section 54 typically cover other administrative powers, appeals, or miscellaneous provisions within the Act's structure, rather than the specific judicial power of probation for offenders.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Destruction of seized narcotic drugs must be done:
A)
By burning them at home
B)
Without court order
C)
In presence of magistrate and as per procedure
D)
After the case has been disposed of
Option C is correct: In presence of magistrate and as per procedure.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Liquor seized under the Act may be:
A)
Returned immediately
B)
Destroyed or disposed of as prescribed
C)
Sold to the public
D)
Exported freely
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, the state has adopted a policy of total prohibition. When liquor is seized by authorized officers during raids or inspections, it is treated as contraband. According to the legal procedures laid down in the Act and the accompanying rules, seized liquor cannot be returned to the offender (as it is illegal to possess), nor can it be sold to the public or exported, as that would defeat the purpose of the Prohibition Act. Instead, the seized liquor must be handled according to the prescribed legal process, which typically involves documentation, sampling for evidence, and subsequent destruction or disposal (such as pouring it down the drain or incineration) to ensure it does not re-enter the market.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
The Chairman of the State Prohibition Council is :
A)
The Chief Minister
B)
Minister of Excise & Narcotics
C)
Commissioner of Excise & Narcotics
D)
The Chief Secretary of Mizoram
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, the State Government constitutes a State Prohibition Council to advise and monitor the implementation of the Act. According to the statutory provisions governing the council's composition, the Chief Minister of Mizoram serves as the ex-officio Chairman of the State Prohibition Council. This ensures that the highest executive authority of the state oversees the prohibition policy.
- Option (b) Minister of Excise & Narcotics: While the Minister oversees the department, the statutory chairmanship of the Council is vested in the Chief Minister.
- Option (c) Commissioner of Excise & Narcotics: The Commissioner typically serves as a member or the Member Secretary, handling administrative execution rather than chairmanship.
- Option (d) The Chief Secretary of Mizoram: The Chief Secretary often serves as a member of such councils representing the state administration, but not as the Chairman.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
What is the minimum imprisonment for selling liquor illegally?
A)
6 months
B)
1 year
C)
2 years
D)
No minimum imprisonment mentioned
Under the Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, the state has implemented a strict prohibition regime. According to the penal provisions of the Act, any person who sells, transports, or possesses liquor illegally is subject to rigorous punishment. Specifically, for the offense of selling liquor, the Act prescribes a minimum term of imprisonment of 1 year, which may extend up to 5 years, along with a fine. This stringent minimum sentence is designed to act as a deterrent against the illegal trade of alcohol within the state of Mizoram. Options (a), (c), and (d) are incorrect as they do not align with the statutory minimum penalty mandated by the 2019 Act.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Liquor stored for private use is:
A)
Legal
B)
Legal up to 5 bottles
C)
Illegal under this Act
D)
Legal on festivals
The Mizoram Liquor (Prohibition) Act, 2019, was enacted to implement a total prohibition of liquor in the state of Mizoram. Under the provisions of this Act, the manufacture, sale, transport, and possession of liquor are strictly prohibited. Unlike some other prohibition laws in different states that may allow a small quantity for personal use or medical purposes under a permit, the MLP Act 2019 aims for a comprehensive ban. Therefore, storing liquor for private use is considered an offense and is illegal under the Act. Options (a), (b), and (d) are incorrect because the Act does not provide a general 'legal' status, a specific bottle-count exemption for private storage, or a festival-based exemption for the possession of prohibited liquor.
Departmental (other) • 2026 • Paper-III
Section 64A provides immunity to addicts if:
A)
They bribe the police
B)
They agree to undergo de-addiction treatment
C)
They name other traffickers
D)
They plead guilty
Option B is correct: They agree to undergo de-addiction treatment.